employee notification system

All posts tagged employee notification system

Employee Alert System Speed

Posted by Dave Burr on June 5, 2020
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

We are often asked the question by our AMG Alerts customers and prospects “How quickly will all of our people receive the message once we launch it?”

Some companies answer this question by giving statistics about the throughput of their system, whether it’s text, email, voice, etc.  Such a reply is misleading. The correct answer to that question is “whenever the message becomes available to the recipient”

Yes, front-end system performance is important, but it really isn’t the determining factor in recipients’ getting the message. In the case of text messaging, carrier networks have to get the messages to devices. The device needs to be available to the network, the network can’t be overloaded with data, and the device must be in the possession of the recipient. So, applying common sense, “all” recipients might not get the message for minutes, hours, or days.

Voice messaging has variables too. A power outage may render landline phones useless, to a significant degree. And if you are sending to a wireless device, you have the same issues as mentioned above.

If you are ringing landline phones in an office environment, normally there isn’t enough bandwidth available to the local equipment to actually ring every extension at the same time. In many cases, less than half of the extensions can be in use at any given time, so an automated system receives busy signals and has to keep trying at various intervals.

In any case, about half of voice calls result in a voicemail being left, so of course the recipient must first discover and listen to the voicemail.

In the case of email, it has to have not gone to spam, the email has to be checked, and the message must be noticed and read.

Common sense? For the most part, yes. What it means is that if people need to be informed of something quickly, it usually means that you need to use as many modes as possible, and a lot needs to go right. Fortunately, most messages sent do not need to be received in seconds, and notification systems largely fulfill their promise, as a whole. But remember that it is what happens downstream that counts.

Employee Alert Systems – Keep it Simple!

Posted by Dave Burr on July 10, 2019
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

Companies are increasingly interested in employee notification systems such as AMG Alerts to deal with unforeseen issues on a timely basis. Sometimes it is as simple as letting employees and partners know that a necessary computer system is down. Other times it may be genuine emergencies that require quick action.

And as we normally suggest, our customers in most cases do not dilute the value of an AMG Alerts notification by mixing the mundane with the vastly important. They use their more traditional communications channels for the former, even if they are slightly less effective at reaching people.

Often, when a company gets started with AMG Alerts, they give careful thought to the setup, sometimes putting in place a system that allows extreme granularity among the Subscriber (our word for potential recipient) population. This allows them to target groups with pinpoint precision. While this seems like it would be a great idea, it has its downsides, which can be significant:

1) Maintenance:  Too much granularity – excessive “categorization” among the Subscriber base – creates an additional maintenance burden. It means that there is more likely that a person will move from one group to another and not be covered by laser-focused messaging until there is an update.

2) Confusion at Alert Launch: During the setup process, it’s clear what the categorization nomenclature means because it’s fresh in everyone’s mind. But then the system may go six months or more before an Admin needs to launch an urgent message. Confusion at that point causes delays or incorrect distribution.

You can set up AMG Alerts to send to Peoria location, Second Shift, Maintenance Department, Group A employees, and target only that group. But you could also send to all Peoria employees and specify who is affected within the message itself (!)

Do what’s right for you, but our motto regarding important messaging is  “Its almost always better to communicate to too many people, than too few.”  Keeping the system simple will almost certainly yield rewards.

Shop Floor Employees – Don’t Leave Them Out!

Posted by Dave Burr on October 29, 2018
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

One challenge that many of our AMG Alerts customers face is the spotty availability of some of the more valuable contact information for non-office employees, usually defined as those who don’t have company-provided emails. With email, the rollout of an employee alert system is truly a piece of cake because you can include signup links. Even if an administrator wants to use another method to populate the alert system database, their HRIS data often contains more contact information (i.e. mobile versus home landlines, personal emails) for office employees than those on the plant floor.

We do see companies give up on the idea of 100% inclusion. They use the alert system to get to a certain level and then rely on front-line management for “last mile” communication. Obviously this compromises effectiveness.

Statistics show that the vast majority of employees, at any level, do have access to email. Granted, in some cases, use may be spotty, but if they are aware of the purpose of the data collection campaign, they will provide it make a special effort to monitor it during the system rollout. Of course while the are providing that, they can provide the other data for use in the alert system, assuming the administrator plans centralized entry of all the data.

One creative thing that some customers have done is provide centralized “kiosks” so that employees can access our portal(s) to enter their information. These are simply web-enabled desktops located in strategic places such as lunchrooms and other common areas. Employees can, over the course of several days, enter in all the necessary data including their preferences.  A “campaign” such as this also highlights the importance of the system, which is another major benefit.

Employee Notification System – Information Gathering

Posted by Dave Burr on September 13, 2018
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

One of the first considerations in the implementation of a mass notification system in a business setting is the population of the communications profiles for employees, particularly in situations where there is not much contact data available.

There are various ways of populating a system. One is to distribute a link, normally via e-mail in which the new system is introduced, and allow employees to sign up and express their preferences. The second, at least within AMG Alerts is to pre-load the system (via file upload) with some data, then use the AMG Alerts system to go out and solicit – via email – preference information, mobile phone numbers, and other relevant bits.

A third is to do it all internally, which works but of course always results in data that is high in “control” but usually lacking in comprehensiveness or accuracy.

The first two methods are the most popular, but in some applications, our potential customer will say “our people on the shop floor don’t have emails”. Notwithstanding that a more accurate statement would be “while we provide corporate email accounts to our office people, the shop personnel are not assigned emails and we don’t know their personal ones”, it is still a challenge to get them ramped up.

Here are some of the options for overcoming this:

  1. Manually distribute the signup URL to the shop people and let them do it that way. Of course, your participation rate could be a little less than perfect to start, but that will get fixed after the first “emergency” (Note that you can use an application like TinyURL to to make the shortest possible URL for the employees if they have to actually type it)
  2. Another cool way of providing the signup link is via a QR code printed in some prominent spot. But not everyone has a reader app on their phone. On the other hand, it is free and useful so it may be a good way of introducing employees to the concept because it has value in other communications
  3. Put the signup link somewhere within the company web site. People can navigate to it at their liesure, perhaps from home
  4. Designate desk or kiosk with the signup for AMG Alerts up and ready to go and allow a few days for employees to spend a minute putting in their profiles
  5. Have front-line managers or HR gather email addresses for each employee, and then that could be part of an initial upload. Then our system can be used to go out and ask for the rest of the information in the profile
  6. A slight variation of the above is to get ALL the information, mimicking on some paper form the information on the AMG Alerts signup, and then pur that in manually or via an upload

The key, unless the system is being maintained completely internally, is to get email addresses for each employee because system maintenance then becomes so much easier using the tools on our site. Just like refrigerators, opinions, and phones, everyone in this day and age has at least one. It isn’t always effortless to get it but the rewards are well worth it!

Employee Notification Systems – In-Office Notification Considerations

Posted by Dave Burr on July 1, 2018
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

We often see customers or potential customers concerned that they be able to ring every extension in the office in order to contact their employees about some critical issue. Some also believe that all extensions ring simultaneously, or nearly so. There are practical issues in play that should cause some to at least “de-emphasize” this approach to emergency communication.

First, most inter-office systems of any significant size actually do not have the bandwidth for every extension to be used at the same time. What happens then is that an automated IVR system encountering a busy or dead air or no answer may (or may not depending on the system) retry on a set interval, and in few cases would or should that interval be “immediate.” During this time, physical communication, or at the very least, behavior, on the part of in-office employees will take place that makes a callback at some later time, even if it is 5 minutes, moot.

For extensions in use, usually the message goes right to voicemail, and again, before the message is actually listened to by the employee, they already get the information from others.

Add to this the real potential that the office phone system would be the first thing to become completely inoperative in a power failure, and ultimately, the key to getting the word out within an office is actual word-of mouth spawned by a notification via wireless devices (whether it is Voice or Text).  Look at your own office – what percentage of employees being actually being told about something via an automated system would be required before action would occur?  10%? 20%? You almost certainly wouldn’t need much more than that.

Voice notification to landlines is most often used in cases where you don’t have the incredible communication leverage that an office situation provides, and is less likely to be bogged down or inoperable than would an office system in an emergency.  Many AMG Alerts customers like the option to call home landline phones depending on the situation, just to extend the possibility that the employee gets the information. Information is so easy to distribute among in-office employees, and the challenge most of our customers face is getting at people who are NOT sitting across the the room from them or in the next cubicle.

Mass Notification System Modes

Posted by Dave Burr on November 3, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

A good mass notification system or employee notification system utilizes many modes in an attempt to reach people. AMG Alerts, for example, uses combinations or e-mail, voice, SMS (text), RSS and other modes to maximize the chance of getting out the message.

One thing we have noticed as we assist our customers is , in many cases, a strong belief that land line phones will be a good method of reaching people. They often summarily profile groups – older or lower income or less educated – as technologically challenged and  seed the system with land line phone numbers, figuring that at least they will be able to use land lines in an emergency.

This is a mistake. First, statistics on wireless phone and internet use do not support the theory that, say, person in a lower socioeconomic class or whom is older does not use a wireless phone or does not have email account.

Secondly, the power grid in many parts of the U.S. is very fragile and will be the first thing to go down. But hey, the more resilient land line phone network will probably be available, right? Probably, but guess what? Most people won’t be able to get to it, as barely anyone has an old-fashioned phone line-powered telephone. In the vast majority of our homes, if the power goes out, you’re not going to be picking up your land line phone to inform the power company.

This makes wireless extremely important. Wireless companies do make an effort to keep their networks alive with backup power, which ultimately can make a wireless network more effective as a mass notification mode than the very reliable land line network, which might be operational but barely accessible.

All of this means that if our customer truly wants to reach their recipient base, they should recognize the use of other communication modes among groups that they might otherwise underestimate, and they should vigorously gather and use that information for a more bulletproof notification system.

Employee Notification System Database Planning

Posted by Dave Burr on October 26, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , . Leave a comment

In a past post we spoke about the value of simplicity in the data structure. Because we see our AMG Alerts customers over-complicating their databases all the time, and it’s been a while, I will touch on this again.

When an organization considers how to split up the population for selective notification (assuming that it’s even necessary), we see evidence the the first question they ask is “How can I split everyone into hierarchies and groups?” There is further evidence that that organizations look to their HRIS database and see how it may be broken out there. But the HRIS is used for a different purpose, so that shouldn’t determine the setup of the notification system.

And unfortunately we also see customers making it as complicated as our system will allow, without regard to whether such minute groupings would ever be used as part of a “response” to a situation.

In mass notification, the “old saying” (the quotes are there because actually we just made this up ourselves) is: “It’s almost always better to inform too many people than too few.” That means that if you break up your database into tiny slivers, your maintenance requirements can grow exponentially. Try not to create a system where just because Joe Tucker is now Salaried instead of Hourly, or he moved from second shift to first shift, he now is not going to get the message because his profile within the notification system hasn’t been updated. Most of the time you can cover subgroups with the message text. Consider blowing away the “shift” subgroup and just send to all Plant employees, “second shift is cancelled tonight.” And there are very few emergencies where you’d send a message to only the people that are Salaried.

Yes, of course there are some good reasons to break up the database. You might need to send sensitive information to the Executive Team that need not be shared with everyone. You might have a very large population and want to minimize messaging costs. Or maybe you send messages so often that you’d get push-back from the “unaffected” portion of the population.

Erring on the side of simplicity, however, is a good policy. Consider REALISTIC scenarios about how you might want to selectively send, and then set up the system that way. Of you start with complexity, the person launching the notification might start using that complexity and you’ll ultimately end up in the “notified ‘too few'” category. If you start with simplicity, you won’t have the “too few” issue problem. You can always break up your database further as you run into realistic scenarios where that is needed.

Text Alert System – Public vs. Private Systems

Posted by Dave Burr on March 29, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , . Leave a comment

In some of our articles regarding employee notification systems and school notification systems, we mention the benefit of a “private” notification system without much clarification.

There are three basic categories of notification system:

Public: These are the government sponsored programs where federal, state, and sometimes local government works with telephone and wireless companies to provide types of warnings, such as Amber Alerts,  to devices. Normally the operating system allows opt-in or -out of these notifications.

Corporate-sponsored: Most people are familiar with, say, television stations scrolling school and sometimes company closures along the bottom of the screen. While to some degree there is “serving of the public interest”, these are basically marketing programs designed to enhance viewership. Similarly, many media outlets allow you to text a keyword to a short code to receive some sort of alert, often related to weather but other messages could be piggybacked along with those. The business concept behind those offerings is to build awareness of and loyalty to the provider of the messages, and sometimes to sell other goods and services.

Private: These are the mass notification systems that YOU control. Obviously they are essential because while a corporate-sponsored system might alert you to the fact that there is a snowstorm in the area, you need a private system to provide whatever details apply specifically to your organization.  And the fact is that the vast majority of notifications that are sent via a private system like AMG Alerts do not deal specifically with anything weather-related (at least in a macro sense) but instead issues that are unforeseen:  security issues, system failures, and other localized phenomena.

Certainly there is a place for all three layers because they serve different purposes.

 

Employee Notification Systems and “Supplier Anonymity”

Posted by Dave Burr on March 10, 2016
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , . Leave a comment

Every one in a while we are asked “does the employee have to know that it is AMG Alerts behind the messaging system, or can we make it appear that it is all our company?”

Transparency is fairly difficult in situations where you are offering portals or various access to the application by employees themselves. But even for companies (our customers) that do not offer any access to profiles, there are still a few issues.

  • Email is more likely to be treated as Spam by various anti-spam programs if the actual Sender is not clear. And in any case, we can’t hide it simply by doing an “on behalf of”, so why even take the risk when the idea is to get the message to the recipient? Proper identification of the Sender is also important so that employees can whitelist right right address(es).
  • On a regular basis, we get contacted by our customers’ employees telling us that they are in the wrong group or wrong company or that their contact information needs to be updated. We are really the only ones visible in some setups. Mass notification system suppliers such as AMG Alerts are ultimately partners in the process, or should be. By the way, the situation where an employee comes to the supplier is one of the many downsides of complete internal management of the database, and this will be covered in a future blog article.
  • Third is the business consideration. Customers actually present considerable risk to mass notification companies because in almost every case, the company do not monitor message content or recipient data – at least in real time. This means that their various supplier and carriers can shut them down, or they may have legal exposure, because of a single rogue customer. Having just enough visibility to give a recipient a place to complain protects the business, which of course protects ALL of the customers.

 

 

Mass Notification System Opt-In/Out for SMS

Posted by Dave Burr on October 16, 2015
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: , , , . Leave a comment

While it may seem straightforward, the issue of opt-in and opt-out in Employee Notification System or Mass Notification System applications can be a tricky one.

First, there is the basic issue of including opt-out information on every outbound text, as good practice usually dictates. In the real world, the recipient should have already received opt-out instructions and sometimes that precious character space in the limited SMS world could be used for the urgent message.

This begs a solution that should include an opt-in or some other on-boarding process for employees, students, residents, or other group that includes clear communications about what types of message they will receive and how to opt out. With our broad base of AMG Alerts customers, we have seen many instances where this might not be happening. Rather than using the external portals that we provide, which provide these instructions (as well as, obviously, the “opt-in”), our customer is uploading data that may not be current, and worse, the use of the system my be different than what might have been specifically “contracted for” by the recipient, as ownership of the alerts program has changed.

We counter this by being up front with our identity on all messages, regardless of mode, as the mass notification system provider and we make sure our customers do the same in terms of their identities. This way, a recipient always has somewhere to go even if they do not follow one of the opt-out processes that we provide.

In fact, our system is “email-based” to a large degree, meaning that we get emails for most people regardless of the mode used for alerts. This is so that our system can be used, by our customer, outside the normal process to directly ASK recipients if they still want to be included in the program and provide an opt-out link. This functionality is handy when the database has been allowed to get “stale” and/or the purpose of the system has changed.

At the end of the day, we have to be ultra-sensitive to SMS “spam” concerns because as bad as e-mail is, at least we have tools to fight it. People see unwanted SMS messages as a real violation, so we always encourage our customers to only upload and use SMS information if they have recent permission for it to be used with their purpose in mind and communicate that it’s coming. Otherwise, use the opt-in/modification portals so that the recipient has control initially and on an ongoing basis.